Lowest Cost Account •Spreads + Commission + Swaps •Educational cost comparison
Raw spread vs standard account: which costs less?
A raw-spread account costs less only when its spread saving is greater than its commission and other additional costs. Compare the same instrument, position size, holding period and account currency. Trading more often increases total costs, but frequency alone does not determine which account is cheaper.
Contents
Is a raw-spread account always cheaper?
A raw-spread account costs less only when its spread saving is greater than its commission and other additional costs. Compare the same instrument, position size, holding period and account currency. Trading more often increases total costs, but frequency alone does not determine which account is cheaper.
Entry/Exit cost
Spread + commission hits every trade. This dominates for scalpers and day traders.
Holding cost
Swaps become your hidden tax if you hold overnight, especially on metals and indices.
Execution friction
Execution can differ from the expected price in either direction. Published spreads alone do not establish execution quality.
Never compare “minimum spreads”. Compare typical spreads during your session and add commission to get the real number.
How to compare spread and commission
Convert each charge into the same currency before adding it. Estimated transaction cost = spread in pips × pip value for the position + total opening-and-closing commission. Add holding charges, applicable conversion/account fees and execution differences separately. Use comparable observed spreads, not an advertised minimum.
Practical comparison method
- Pick one instrument you actually trade (e.g., EUR/USD or XAU/USD).
- Compare typical spreads during your session (London/NY overlap is a solid baseline).
- Convert spread and total opening-and-closing commission to the same currency before adding them.
- If you hold overnight, compare swap long and swap short.
Worked example: one EUR/USD round trip
Hypothetical illustration, not broker quotes or a recommendation.
Assume a 100,000 EUR position, a USD account, EUR/USD pip size of 0.0001 and USD 10 pip value. The spread is unchanged in this illustration. No overnight holding, slippage or other fees are included.
Standard: USD 12
Assumed 1.2-pip spread and no separate commission: 1.2 × USD 10 = USD 12.
Raw: USD 9
Assumed 0.2-pip spread and USD 3.50 commission per side: 0.2 × USD 10 + USD 7 round-turn commission = USD 9.
The raw account is USD 3 lower in this example. The break-even standard spread is 0.2 + 7 ÷ 10 = 0.9 pips. At an assumed standard spread of 0.8 pips, the standard account costs USD 8 and is cheaper instead.
Count the spread once under these simplified round-trip assumptions; count commission on both sides. Pip value differs for other instruments, position sizes and account currencies. Do not apply this EUR/USD example directly to gold or JPY pairs.
What could change the result?
Check financing over the actual holding period; current commission currency and per-side versus round-turn basis; conversion and withdrawal fees; account/platform restrictions; and execution differences. Minimum spreads are not averages. Cost alone does not establish suitability or safety.
Standard vs Raw accounts
Compare the same position and holding period using current account terms. Account names and trading frequency alone do not determine cost or suitability.
Standard account
SimplerPricing may be built into the spread, but check instrument-specific commissions and all other applicable fees.
- Compare: total cost for the same trade
- Cost structure: wider spread, usually no commission
- Watch: spread widening during volatility
Raw-spread account
Tight + commissionA narrower spread may be offset by commission. Compare both sides of commission and the same instrument-specific costs.
- Compare: spread saving versus additional commission
- Cost structure: tight spread + commission per lot
- Watch: calling it “cheap” without adding commission
Break-even rule: a raw account costs less only when its spread saving exceeds its additional commission and other costs.
Which account is cheapest for your trading style?
“Lowest cost” is context. Use this map so you don’t optimise the wrong number.
Scalpers
Optimise spread + commission as one number. Execution stability matters as much as pricing.
Day traders
Look for consistent typical spreads during your hours, not marketing minimums.
Swing/position
Swaps can dominate. A slightly wider spread can be cheaper if swaps are favourable.
Swap costs: the most ignored fee
If you hold overnight, swap is not “small”. Swaps can flip the cheapest account choice.
- Check swap long and swap short for your top instruments.
- Know the triple-swap day (broker dependent).
- Don’t assume low spreads mean low swaps.
Execution & slippage: when cheap isn’t cheap
Slippage is the difference between the expected and executed price; it can be favourable or adverse. Read the execution policy and understand that spreads and fills can change during volatility.
- A demo can help explain platform controls but does not reproduce all live conditions.
- Read the current withdrawal and execution policies before deciding whether to trade.
- Neither a demo nor a successful withdrawal proves safety or future reliability.
Non-trading fees checklist
Even with good pricing, an account can become “expensive” through funding friction.
Deposit & withdrawal fees
Check method-specific charges, limits and timing.
Currency conversion
If your base currency differs, conversion can cost more than spreads.
Inactivity fees
If you trade occasionally, inactivity fees can be your real cost.
Comparison table: what to check before calling it “lowest cost”
Use this to shortlist fast and avoid the “0.0 spread” trap.
| Category | What to compare | Why it matters | Decision rule |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | Typical spread (not “from”) | Baseline cost for entries/exits | Prefer consistent typical spreads over marketing minimums |
| Commission | Round-turn per lot | Raw accounts only look cheap until you add commission | Convert spread and round-turn commission to the same currency |
| Swaps | Swap long or swap short for the actual position | Dominant cost for holds | If you hold overnight often, swaps are priority #1 |
| Execution | Slippage, rejects, stability | Hidden fee via bad fills | Review execution policies and slippage risk |
| Funding friction | Withdraw fees + time + conversion | Creates “expensive” experience despite good spreads | Review current withdrawal terms; a successful withdrawal does not validate safety |
Fast shortlist checklist
If a broker/account fails any of these, remove it.
Regulation and entity clarity first
If licensing is unclear, low cost is irrelevant.
Use typical spreads + commission
Your cost is the all-in number, not a marketing claim.
If you hold overnight, compare swaps
Swaps can flip your cheapest choice.
Review policies and research limits
Neither a demo nor a successful withdrawal proves safety or future reliability.
Check current provider documents
Examples of official documents to consult: CMC Markets Canada account comparison (Canada-specific; does not establish eligibility elsewhere) and eToro fee categories (check the relevant entity and product). These sources illustrate what to verify; the EUR/USD figures above are invented assumptions, not quotes from either provider.
ForexTabs may earn a commission from some broker links. Listings do not guarantee suitability, safety or returns.
FAQ
Is a raw-spread account always cheaper than a standard account?
How do I convert commission into pips?
Does trading more often make a raw account cheaper?
ForexTabs • Low-Cost Checklist
Now check the real account terms
Confirm your country and legal entity first, then compare the same cost fields in the broker’s current documents. Cost alone does not establish suitability or safety.
Trading involves risk. Never trade money you can’t afford to lose.